• Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • RSS

  • Podcast
  • In The Queue
  • Reviews
  • Play It Forward
  • Info
  • Miscellaneous

Archive for December, 2011


caticonslite_bm_alt

Old School

Filed Under: In The Queue by Ryan — Leave a comment
December 26, 2011

Starring: Luke Wilson, Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn

Directed by: Todd Phillips

As one of my goals for 2012 – in addition to publishing In The Queue on a more regular basis than I did in 2011 – I plan to fill some of the gaps in my movie viewing experience. Recently, my work compatriot Jeremy Alexander was shocked to hear I had never seen Old School and Wedding Crashers. At the time these movies were popular, I pretty much dismissed them (especially Old School). I wasn’t really a fan of Will Ferrell in his SNL roles and hadn’t yet seen the absolutely fabulous Talladega Nights or Anchorman yet.  So to begin playing catch-up on pop movies, I started with Old School.

The main trio of Mitch (Luke Wilson), Frank (Will Ferrell) and Beanie (Vince Vaughn) are theoretically representing the spectrum of relationships for 30-year-old males.  Beanie is jadedly married with two kids, coaches soccer for his 6ish-year-old and sometimes packs around the baby in one of those sling carrier things.

Will Ferrell is the newly-married and semi-domesticated guy…the one who dedicates weekend days to lame home shopping/improvement activities with his brand new wifey.  He didn’t listen when Beanie tried a last-ditch (i.e. while the bride-to-be was walking down the aisle) and hilarious speech to get him to reconsider marriage.

Mild-mannered Mitch is newly single, catapulting himself out of a comfortable relationship after discovering his girlfriend (Juliette Lewis) hosted polyamorous parties while he was traveling for work.  Moving to a sweet rental house right off the campus of Harrison University, Mitch is ready to relax and regroup.  Beanie has bigger plans for Mitch and his new place – primarily turning it into party central, supplied by resources from the Speaker City store chain he owns.

Mitch – who would actually rather date women his own age like Nicole (Ellen Pompeo) – reluctantly joins in the fun but still has a good time.  Frank stumbles back into his party self, aka  ”Frank the Tank,” streaking his way out of his new wife’s good graces.  And to boot, Harrison University Dean Pritchard (Jeremy Piven, whose character I assume was the inspiration for ‘nerdy Pete Wentz’ in the 2005 video for “Dance, Dance”) recognizes Mitch, Beanie and Frank as guys who used to pick on him years ago.  He serves them with a notice the house has been re-zoned and now must be used only for campus housing or social service activities.

Mopey Mitch comes home the next night to find his house stuffed with guys of all ages, races, creed and levels of education.  To preserve his vicarious lifestyle, Beanie has decided they will start a fraternity in the house, open to everyone.  From this motley group, they choose 14 pledges – many college students, but also a couple middle-aged businessmen and an octogenarian named Blue that hangs around one of the Speaker City stores.  In an absolutely hilarious sequence of pledge kidnapping and hazing activities, the fraternity is born.  And thus they manage to escape the wrath of Dean Pritchard for the time being.

You know the rest – the Dean finds another way to block the guys, they find a loophole…happy ending, etc etc etc.  The movie overall is significantly funnier than I expected it, particularly due to:

  • Beanie’s pre-wedding speech, with hilarious cautions to the groom punctuated by a ridiculously sappy compliment for the father of the bride.
  • The Fight Club-esque way people talk about the fraternity and refer to Mitch as The Godfather.
  • The pledge class having to work at Beanie’s son’s birthday party
  • The excellent peppering in of random stars in small roles and cameos here and there throughout the film.
  • The Dean Pritchard chase scene
  • The mini-scenes running during the credits.

If you:

  • Liked Revenge of the Nerds or any movie where the underdog wins
  • Don’t take Greek Life too seriously
  • Are in the mood for a comedy that’s wittily stupid

Put it in the queue!

However, if you:

  • Are worried your significant other will disapprove of your watching this movie or if you ARE a disapproving significant other
  • Don’t think streaking on the quad is funny
  • Cannot appreciate Vince Vaughn

Don’t put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Comment
caticonslite_bm_alt

The Descendants and Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

Filed Under: Podcast by Drew — Leave a comment
December 20, 2011
Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (40.7MB)

This will probably be our last show of 2011. Luckily, we were able to go out on top with The Descendants and the new Mission Impossible film, which should not be confused with the terrible Commadore 64 game, Impossible Mission. Goodbye 2011, you were really full of ups and downs, and then some more downs, then really bottoming out with the The Human Centipede 2. If this show doesn’t interest you, at least listen to the first 2 minutes to find out what sadly constitutes as a nightmare for me. Happy Holidays, and all that jazz.

Tags: Descendants, Ghost Protocol, Mission Impossible
Comment
caticonslite_bm_alt

Cropsey

Filed Under: Reviews by Ryan — Leave a comment
December 7, 2011

Directed by: Barbara Brancaccio, Joshua Zeman

Cropsey is a documentary about that one stereotypical scary story everybody tells around the campfire, the one about the guy with a hook for a hand who hangs out in the woods…or lives on your street…or in the abandoned warehouse just down the block.  The ones that are obviously just stories.  But are they based on some semblance of fact?

In the early to mid-80s, on Staten Island, there was a string of children disappearances, most of which involved the mentally handicapped.  The documentary focuses primarily on the disappearance of Jennifer Schweiger, a young girl with down syndrome who disappeared in July of 1987.  Shortly thereafter, Andre Rand was arrested in relation to the crime due to eyewitness accounts putting him with the young girl earlier in the day.

Although Rand is at the center of the documentary, the filmmakers also delve deeply in to the history of Willowbrook, a state school for the mentally handicapped found on Staten Island.  In 1972 it was the focal point of an expose reported by a young Geraldo Rivera, trying to shed light on the unsuitable conditions therein.  Andre Rand was an orderly at the school, and after it shut its doors in the early 80s it was believed Rand still lived on the grounds in makeshift hovels, along with many of the misplaced patients who had nowhere to go when the building closed.

I’m not completely sure what the filmmakers initially set out to do.  As the film begins it feels more like any news piece run on a program like 48 Hours or Dateline.  Were they really thinking they were going to uncover something new or interesting in a case over 20 years old?  When the documentary was being filmed, Rand was getting ready to stand trial for the disappearance of another girl who had gone missing years earlier on the island.  Were they just rehashing facts, making a film based on a subject sure to have renewed interest given the circumstances?

I don’t know if it was what they had planned all along or if, at some point, they decided just rehashing the facts wasn’t going to be interesting enough to warrant a feature-film documentary, but the piece eventually starts to subtly sway away from whether Rand committed the crimes or not to an in depth look at the preconceived notions everybody, even the authorities, bring with them in to a case of this magnitude.

Some of the interviewees, including detectives who worked on the case, say they were sure Rand was part of a satanic cult.  Some say he was the ringleader of a group of former patients still living on the grounds who kidnapped the children for the sake of abusing them.  Some say he was a necrophile.  Some say a gopher for something larger and more deviant.  During the trial, eye-witnesses who hadn’t spoken in over twenty years pop out of nowhere to now claim they had seen something pertaining to the case.  Despite no physical evidence, families of many of the victims insist Rand is the culprit, hoping for closure to a mentally destructive portion of their past.

What begins as a film feeling like it wants to shed light on to the tired old formula of whether the perpetrator did or did not commit the murders, turns in to a look at how urban legends are built, and how rumors and different points of view often times distort the image of people we know nothing about.

There are clips of Rivera’s expose of Willowbrook, and they are haunting.  The areas are dark and windowless, the children are moaning and rocking, most naked, some bent in unnatural contortions.  Rivera reports in most building there may be one attendant for upwards of 50 mentally handicapped children, and all areas smelled of disease and death.  I shudder to think about the number of patients who died on the premises and were simply swept under the rug.  In what I assume was the culminating soliloquy of his piece, Rivera sums it up perfectly, “What we found and documented here is a disgrace to all of us.  This place isn’t a school it’s a dark corner where we throw children who aren’t pretty to look at, it’s the big town’s leper colony.”

There’s a portion of the film where Rand decries that everybody at Willowbrook, including the staff, were victims.  After seeing the conditions in the hospital, I can’t believe anybody who worked there didn’t come away mentally scarred.  Could working in those conditions day in and day out have caused psychological damage so deep to Rand he felt it was his duty to “save” the children from parents who he didn’t believe wanted them?  It makes more sense than any of the other theories posited.  But, then, maybe it’s the filmmakers, adeptly making me feel a certain way with leading interviews and subtle inferences.  Who’s to say?

Written by Ryan Venson

Comment
caticonslite_bm_alt

Wild Target

Filed Under: In The Queue by Ryan — Leave a comment
December 1, 2011

Starring: Bill Nighy, Emily Blunt, Rupert Grint

Directed by: Jonathan Lynn

Quick, what comes to mind when you think of a British family business?  Perhaps a tea shop with freshly-baked biscuits aplenty, a haberdashery, or a B&B Fawlty Towers style?  Hang on just a minute – how about a family of assassins?

Victor Maynard (Bill Nighy) is a middle-aged gun for hire with the look of a respectable banker and the neat accuracy of a 007.  For his 55th birthday, his dear old mum (Eileen Atkins) presents him with a scrapbook of articles about his successful kills. Though he hasn’t yet got a son to carry on the family trade, he does have a strong reputation within the field.

Until he’s hired to take out the devil-may-care Rose (Emily Blunt).  Whether she’s riding through a museum on a bike with a basket with reckless abandon and apparent innocence to spare or strolling through town lifting scarves, pocketbooks and clothing at a rate that would make the Oliver Twist gang blush – Rose is clearly a loose cannon.  In a fabulous fashion parade of sky-high stiletto heels and brightly-colored tights.

After pulling the old switcheroo on an art aficionado (Rupert Everett) who thought he was getting a vintage Rembrandt and ended up with a clever fake, Rose ends up on Victor’s hit list.  Unwittingly eluding Victor’s aim, Rose ends up in the crosshairs of a completely different threat – the bodyguards of the art collector she stuck with the faux Rembrandt.  Of course, things are completely bollocksed up, and errant car wash boy Tony (Rupert Grint) gets pulled into the whole mess after he shoots one of the bodyguards.

Victor can’t bring himself to kill Rose – especially after she offers him a nice sum of money to protect her – so he, Rose and Tony go on the lam.

Overall, I found Wild Target quite a laugh.  There are car chases, buffoonery, poking fun at the stuffy British stereotype, a feisty aged parent, a drunken birthday party, an ex-parrot and a humorous rivalry with another hitman (Martin Freeman).

If you:

  • Like British humor
  • Are highly amused by actors playing quite the opposite of another well-known role, such as:
    • Queen Victoria Emily Blunt vs. con woman/thief Emily Blunt
    • Dr. Watson Martin Freeman vs. sadistic hitman Martin Freeman (Cor!!)
    • Ron Weasley Rupert Grint vs clueless assassin in training Rupert Grint
    • Like films where the main schtick is based around unlikely partners in crime (literally!)

Put it in the queue!

If you:

  • Prefer your British crime films to star James Bond
  • Are not amused by characters with a complete disregard for traffic
  • Would find it weird to see Ron Weasley smoking a cigarette in the bath

Don’t put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Comment
  • Recent Entries

    • The Puffy Chair
    • Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan’s Hope
    • The Avengers and Dead Heat
    • Cabin in the Woods and Birdemic
    • 21 Jump Street and The Hunger Games
  • Browse Popular Tags

    127 hours a-team alice in wonderland automaton transfusion Bad Lieutenant Capra carriers catfish Crazies danny boyle Daybreakers Descent dinocroc Evil Aliens Girl with the Dragon Tattoo Harry Potter Human Centipede Inception Iron Man It Happened One Night james franco King Kong let the right one in machete movie movies Piranha Podcast Predator Predators Rogue Salt Saw 3-D Scott Pilgrim Shutter Island slumdog millionaire social network splice supergator ThanksKilling Them tim burton Timecrimes toy story 3 Unstoppable
  • Posts by Date

    December 2011
    S M T W T F S
    « Nov   Jan »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Friends & links

    • IMDB
    • Rotten Tomatoes
    • Spicyfishy
  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact Us
  • Monthly archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
Powered by WordPress | Theme: Motion by 85ideas. | Login
[ Back to top ]