Grindhouse Pt. 2 -- Death Proof

Starring: Kurt Russell, Vanessa Ferlito, Zoe Bell, Rosario Dawson Directed by: Quentin Tarantino

“Death Proof” starts out quite differently.  Instead of just throwing you in to the scrum, it starts out in a car with three lovely young ladies discussing their plans for the evening.  Sticking close to the “heavily-worn print of a film” theme there are some terrible jumps interrupting large portions of dialogue, grainy footage, and even a little poor audio thrown in.  After they talk about their plans for the evening they talk about their plans some more.  Then a little more.  And after that, a little more.  Then they go to a bar and drink some margaritas.  The film takes a while to get going.

The direction/cinematography incorporates a lot of color, but still distinctly 70s, sticking to the same formula as “Planet Terror.”  Lots of orange/brown/red/with flecks of green.  The sets are made to look like the 70s, with vintage posters everywhere, pinned on bar walls laden with faux-wood paneling.  The clothes the characters are wearing are 70s-ish as well -- daisy dukes and ultra small t-shirts with the colored stripes around the neck and sleeves.  The direction itself is actually very modern with a lot of interesting shots, reminding me something I often forget -- Tarantino is actually quite a good director.

There is, however, one small flaw in the film: Nothing ever happens.  Ever.  When it was released separately of “Planet Terror”, it was re-edited and given a 114 minute playing time.  That’s pretty long, especially for an exploitation film.  And it seems more like 314 minutes.  Waiting for that big action sequence at the end of the “first act?” Well, you’re gonna have to wait 50 minutes, and the scene itself is going to last about a minute and a half.  What a pay-off!

What’s weird is ““Death Proof”” itself plays like two separate films.  The first film, clocking in at about 55 minutes long, is a sly, winking, well directed homage to exploitation, even if it is a little sluggish.  The second film, which is also about 55 minutes long, is an extremely boring, overlong, overstuffed, simply mind-numbingly dull, modern piece of cinema dedicated to stunt people.

The second ““Death Proof”” act starts out the same way as the first, three lovely young ladies in a car, going to pick up a fourth.  However, this is just modern cinema.  It’s a bright, mid 2007 day, and gone are all the bad edits, scratchy film and interesting colors.  The only thing tying this to the first portion of the film is Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell).

There’s a lengthy conversation about picking up a copy of “Italian Vogue” which is utterly and fascinatingly uninteresting.   On the way to wherever they are going, the ladies spend six minutes in a car talking about sex, with the majority of the dialogue based around using the word “fuck” as an adjective, noun, verb, and  pronoun.  It’s kinda’ like when you used to watch “Smurfs” as a kid.  “Hey fuck, could you go fuck me a fuck?”

After this thrilling scene, we are treated to another eight minutes of banal dialogue punctuated with fucks.  No lie. It starts out with a three minute long story about falling in to a ditch, punctuated with eleven f-bombs and topped off with the zinger “I resemble that remark.”

“I resemble that remark?”  Excuse my French, but what the fuck am I watching?!  If I had never heard the joke I wouldn’t think it’s funny, but I have heard it about a thousand times, and this is the big pay-off of the segment.  It was, during this scene, I did something I never do while watching a film.  I fast-forwarded to the next scene.  I’m not proud of it, but I think I am better off for it.

Look, I can’t complain about this portion of the film enough.  This same formula is repeated for the next twenty minutes of film, without a single line of engaging dialogue.  This isn’t an exaggeration.  All of this seems like something Kevin Smith would write.  Forty years from now.  After a stroke-induced coma.  It’s boring, it’s repetitive, it’s uninteresting, and it isn’t even vaguely humorous.

The whole crux of the “second act” is the last 15 minutes of film where an honest-to-god action piece takes place.  Zoe Bell (a real-life stunt person playing herself) convinces Kim (Tracie Thoms) to drive her around at startlingly fast speeds while she hangs out strapped to the hood of a car by a pair of belts.  This movie is so lazy it can’t even invent a reason to have an action scene besides stunt people, even when they aren’t performing stunts, like to do stupid shit that put their lives in danger.

Eventually Stuntman Mike, in his car, attacks the three girls, in their car.  There are actual stunt people hanging off vehicles whilst cars bang violently in to one another.  In a time and place where most action sequences revolve around CGI, this is a breath of fresh air.

For about two minutes.  Then it turns in to an action sequence mirroring the repetitive dialogue sequences from earlier.  The cars crash in to each other repeatedly.  The girls scream ad nauseam.  They finally get Zoe Bell off the hood of the car.  They go after Stuntman Mike.  Stuntman Mike screams ad nauseam.  And the girls, believe it or not, repetitively use the words “fuck” and “motherfucker,” until you want to tear your ears off.

Maybe I would be less critical of this film if it wasn’t part of a “grindhouse” double feature, but when I think of a modern exploitation film I think of tongue-in-cheek violence, ironic humor and, most of all fun.  This film doesn’t satisfy any of those criteria.

Written by Ryan Venson

Lost

Starring: Matthew Fox, Evangeline Lilly, Jorge Garcia, Terry O'Quinn, Josh Holloway I remember when Lost first aired. My dad faithfully watched at least the first season but when I asked him what was going on in the show, all I remember is him telling me there were polar bears on the island and weird stuff kept happening. Whatever.

So I never really got into the show.  Until a few weeks ago.

Ryan really wanted me to start watching Lost.  I balked for a while, but then sat down one Thursday evening after diinner and watched the pilot.  Then another episode.  Then another.  With the instant gratification of Netflix, I watched the entire first season in eight days.  Possibly with the exception of the first season of Castle, that’s the fastest I’ve ever watched a season of anything.

The premise is simple – after the Ocenania flight 815 crashes on its way from Sydney, Australia to Los Angeles, a group of survivors wake up and try to figure out what’s going on.  The first one you meet is Jack (Matthew Fox), a doctor who serves as the de facto leader as he tries to sort out the dazed survivors as well or wounded.  Throughout the first season (and at least the first six episodes of the second season) he always walks around looking worried to various degrees – as if he is constantly second-guessing his leadership capability.

Among the roughly 45 survivors, only a handful are truly important to the progression of the plot.  Each one has some sort of personal burden or secret, artfully revealed through flashbacks woven into the episodes.  Your main characters (aside from Jack) are:

  • Kate (Evangeline Lilly) – Wherever there is a hike through the jungle, Kate wants to be a part of it.  Whenever Jack wants to go do something dangerous, Kate wants to tag along.  Whenever someone tells her what to do, Kate doesn’t listen.  Torn between Jack and Sawyer (i.e. whoever is most useful to her at the time), Kate has a very interesting past that she’d like to hide.
  • Locke (Terry O’Quinn) – The resident philosopher, Locke was traveling home from a Walkabout tour and has suitcases full of knives.  Creepy, yes.  Helpful for survival on an island, also yes.  As an able hunter and tracker, Locke helps keep the survivors surviving – until he gets sidetracked by an interesting find.  He also alienates some by insisting everything is destiny and that the island requires personal sacrifices from time to time to move them toward a resolution.
  • Charlie (Dominic Monaghan) – A musician in a formerly-popular band, Charlie has a big problem to deal with and a past that’s nothing to be proud of.  The island is like his chance to start over and do right.  Though his touchiness and temper cause some problems, overall he gets his opportunity to do right with Claire.
  • Claire (Emilie de Ravine) –  When then plane crashes, Claire is about eight months pregnant.  She can’t really do much on the island except write in her journal, sort through suitcases and wait to get rescued.  However, she also can’t do much to defend herself should others be interested in something she has…
  • Michael and Walt (Harold Perrineau and Malcolm David Kelley) – After basically being shut out of most of his son’s life, Michael now finds himself an instant father to nine-year-old Walt.  Michael’s uncertainty about his role and authority makes him a bit of an angry character in this season.  Walt, often accompanied by his dog Vincent, has his own share of struggles – though befriending Locke makes it a bit easier for him to cope.
  • Jin (Daniel Dae Kim) and Sun (Yunjin Kim) Kwon – This South Korean couple hangs on the fringes for part of the season as they do not speak English.  Which leads to some misunderstandings due to language barrier.  However, Jin does not endear himself to the other survivors by closely monitoring his wife’s behavior – ensuring men don’t talk to her, making sure she has all her cardigan buttons buttoned even though they are stranded on a tropical island.  Things are not peachy between them either, and they emerge as very distinct and interesting characters as the season progresses.
  • Hurley (Jorge Garcia) – Dude.  Hurley seems like a pretty regular guy.  He’s friendly, laid-back, frequently wandering about the beach with his headphones on.  He’s a perceptive guy and notices that all the survivors seem to be a little stressed out, so he builds a golf course with some material salvaged from the wreckage to lighten the mood a bit.  However, his mood is not always the lightest. He has a strange obsession with a set of numbers he believes are extremely unlucky.
  • Sayid (Naveen Andrews) – A former soldier in the Iraq Republican Guard – which does not win him instant trust among the largely American survivors – Sayid is also an electronics expert.  He makes an early effort to locate and leverage a radio signal to help them put out a distress call.  His other adventures include an inquisition of Sawyer and being taken prisoner by another island inhabitant.
  • Shannon (Maggie Grace) and Boone (Ian Somerhalder) – This brother-sister duo from a wealthy family do not seem to have a lot of survival-style skills in demand at the moment.  Shannon spends much of the first week on the island working on her tan and waiting to be rescued.  When this doesn’t seem to be happening anytime soon, Boone teams up with Locke to make himself useful.  Shannon continues to struggle with perceptions she’s not useful – though when she’s not having asthma attacks or sulking, she does help translate a map and is really good at tying knots.
  • Sawyer (Josh Holloway) – The crown prince of one-liners, Sawyer is the guy everyone loves to hate.  After scavenging through the wreckage for choice items like medicine, single-serving liquor bottles and other niceties, he runs a little trading post in his tent.  Of course this irritates the bejeezus out of self-sacrificing Jack.   When Sawyer is not reading a mysterious letter, reading paperbacks that washed up on shore, selling accoutrements, or making up nicknames for Kate such as “Freckles,” “Sassafras,” and “Cupcake,” he is trying to forget his tragic past.

The characters really make the show – without excellent casting, without interesting back stories this would just be a boring drama about people arguing in the jungle and on the beach.  You have to care about the characters to want to keep watching.  The weird elements in the show (polar bears, the whispering jungle, a strange door with no handle buried in the middle of nowhere) would not be enough to keep me watching – what does is figuring out how the characters are going to act and react to keep surviving. Also, there are a ton of coincidences baked into the plot – the characters are more connected than they know, and it’s fun to notice these links (some less subtle than others) as they emerge.

I highly recommend the first season.  If you:

  • Like character-driven drama
  • Are ok with the absurd
  • Enjoy a story with the acknowledgement things can be more than they appear and that destiny and fate might exist
  • Like trying to figure out symbolism and meaning in pop culture

Put it in the queue!

I know this show is probably not for everyone.  So if you:

  • Have no patience with a show that ‘peels the onion’ by selectively revealing aspects of the characters’ lives one vignette at a time
  • Don’t have time to watch several episodes in a row
  • Don’t like to watch sweaty and/or bloody survivors running about in the jungle
  • Have a fear of flying that would be made worse by several depictions of the plane breaking apart midair

Don’t put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Grindhouse Pt. 1 -- Planet Terror

Starring: Rose McGowan, Freddy Rodríguez Directed by: Robert Rodriguez

When Grindhouse was released way back in 2007 I was intrigued but failed to catch it in theatres.  It turned out not being overtly popular and had a fairly short run.  Plus I always have trouble gearing myself up to sit in a movie theatre for over 3 hours to watch a film.

When it came out on video I was incensed at their decision to release it as two separate films, without the fake trailers everybody raved about (you can see them on youtube, however.)  Lousy.  That’s a George Lucas-type move.

Finally four years later Drew finally talked me in to watching his copies of the films.  Free is free, after all, and I was still intrigued to see how the films stacked up to recent exploitation films, as well as where they fit in to the directors oeuvre.

First up, Robert Rodriguez’s “Planet Terror”.

“Planet Terror” starts out with a stripper, severed testicles, a gun fight and the release of an experimental bio-weapon in to the atmosphere.  I can’t dream of a better way to start a film.  The bio-weapon starts mutating people, making them in to flesh-hungry zombie-like creatures.

By and large that’s the plot of the film.  There’s a bit of an explanation near the end of the film as to why Lt. Muldoon (Bruce Willis) released the gas on an unsuspecting population, but plot is about the least important aspect of this film.  This is all about visuals and violence.

The film is shot to look like a 70s film, but still taking place in the present day.  The color of the film, in particular, goes a long was to giving it a retro feel.  Lots and lots of orange and green and brown, with dimly lit set pieces.  In post-production the film was given various effects to make it look old.  It’s very grainy, with 35mm scratches and lots of jumps to indicate missing lengths of film.  In one particularly funny gag, the film suddenly stops, replaced by a few frames of apology from management.  Seems as though they have lost an entire reel of film!  When the film start back up you have lost an entire 10-15 minutes of film, and you are thrust back in to the action with little explanation as to what’s going on.

The film relies on a lot of over-the-top violence to both entertain and humor the viewer.  Cherry Darling (Rose McGowan) has a leg chewed off by a zombie and replaces it first with a table leg and later with a machine gun.  Sheriff Hague (Michael Biehn) gets his neck nearly torn in two, and they patch him up with a neck tourniquet.  Numb hands, severed limbs, pulsating face pustules and gore geysers galore, all play a part in the film.  Some of it is retread from the films it’s paying homage to, but there is enough inventive here to keep the viewer on board throughout.  In the end, this is exactly what I would expect, and what I wanted, from a film with “grindhouse” roots.

Written by Ryan Venson

Super 8 - Troll 2 - Best Worst Movie

Super 8
Super 8
troll 2
troll 2

There is a little something for everyone in this episode. We review a good movie, a bad movie, and a good movie about a bad movie. If only we could find a bad movie about a good movie...like a 6 hour finger puppet retelling of Citizen Kane... and all of the dialogue is written in haiku form...and the camera is always  just slightly out of focus...and it stars Hillary Swank. Gives me chills just thinking about Hillary Swank continuing to star in movies. This episode does run a little long, almost an hour I believe, but when you are talking about Super 8 and Troll 2 it is impossible to be brief. Enjoy the show and please watch the amazing PSA from the Alamo Drafthouse. http://youtu.be/1L3eeC2lJZs

Predator 2...........the comic!!

Written by Ryan Venson The thing about comic book adaptations of movies is they are almost always terrible.  Companies aren’t trying to sell you an ongoing series, just an issue or two, and you are buying the issue based on a name instead of hoping for a quality product.  You might see an adaptation of “Die Hard” or “Under Siege” and think, “Kick-ass!” only to open it and find out Jon Bogdanove did the pencils.

Fuck I hate Jon Bogdanove.

Considering how terrible the actual film “Predator 2” was, I couldn’t imagine the 2-issue comic being anything more than a festering pile of dung.  Hippopotamus dung.  And boy did what I get defy all expectations.  I mean that statement seriously.  No sarcasm intended.  Really.

This is one of the, if not the, best comic book adaptation I have ever seen.

The adaptation sticks close to the root of the film, including all the important scene, dialogue and plot points.  And, most surprisingly, the art doesn’t completely blow.  Hey look, it’s the scene at the beginning of the film I was relentlessly mocking in my film portion of the review!

Although after he sneaks up on the dealers here he yells , “Surprise, Muchachos!” instead of “Hey assholes!”

Published by Dark Horse Comics, the mini-series doesn’t lack on gore and even throws in a couple expletives, but the film was simply expletive LACED.  Let’s not forget this is the movie that gave us one of the finest pieces of dialogue ever to be uttered on the silver screen:  After Harrigan (Danny Glover) is told he has to cooperate with special agent Keyes (Busey) in any further drug trafficking investigating, Harrigan replies, “Which means you’re cutting off my dick and shoving it up my ass.”

Simply elegant.

Here’s an entire page taken from issue one, penciled by Dan Barry with colors by Lurene Haines.  Notice how much Glover actually looks like Glover.  Pretty impressive.  But the guy in the top left panel knocking on the door?  That’s supposed to be GARY BUSEY.  And the guy in the bottom left corner who looks like he’s about to be eaten by a giant Danny Glover head?  That’s supposed to be BILL PAXTON.

Now, I can understand Paxton to some degree.  He’s kind of an everyman.  But Busey?  This is Busey:

I mean, look at that guy!  He’s a walking caricature!  You have got to come harder than that Dan Barry!  This guy looks 100% more like 1990 Corbin Bernsen than he does 1990 Gary Busey.

This reason I make a point to mention the colorist is because it nearly ruins the book.  Seriously.  The art is above average for a movie adaptation, and then the colorist comes in and slops it on.  Look at the above panels.  In panel three, Keyes’ face is pink and white with purple blotches.  Did he just get in a fight?  There are a number of panels throughout where it looks as

though Harrigan is wearing lipstick.  There appears to be some kind of backwards shading.  Look at the coats on these panels.  Keyes’ coat is green, but why is there so much white in it?  Same with all the clothes throughout.  In some places it looks like the colorist had troubles staying “in the lines,” almost like those old paint with water books I was so fond of when I was five.  Why can’t anything just be a solid color?

Paint with Water.......Go-Bots?  I don't remember ANYBODY collecting Go-Bots.  I collected He-Man and GI Joe and Thundercats, and lots of people collected Transformers and Star Wars figures, and maybe even some collected MASK or Sectaurs or something.  But Go-Bots?  NOBODY.

Back on subject.....it all works well enough despite my couple minor complaints and, in a bit of a surprise, a totally different team created the second issue, including Mark Bright pencils and Monika Livingston colors.  Bright penciled a number of comics in the early 90s, including the stretch run of one of my favorite comics, Power Man & Iron Fist, so the art is on point, just different.  The first issue took pains to look and feel realistic, but the second looks and feels much more like a comic.  There’s totally nothing wrong with this shift in tone, especially as the pencils are still above average and the colors are infinitely better.

Here’s half a page, mirroring the scene I captured for the review of the film.  It still looks enough like Glover, but look how much cooler he looks in a nice suit and without a hat.  As a matter of fact, the comic sticks painfully close to the movie, but almost every scene seems better suited to be a comic book  illustration.  For instance, this scene where the

Predator rips out Lambert’s (Paxton) spine.   More colorful, more exciting, more explicit than the film.  I’m not sure if the correct onomatopoeia for spine-yanking is skriiiiich but, then, I have never torn somebody’s spine straight from their back.  Yet.

And this scene, as Harrigan chases down the Predator even makes more sense.  Instead of just falling down a hole in an elevator shaft for a giant wtf, he chases it in to a sewer, which is marginally less nonsensical.  And look at panel six.  The Alien skull!

In the end this adaptation hits all the important parts, large and small, of the film; it’s drawn well and is much more concise, and you don’t have to waste an hour and a half of your life for scenes where Glover yells at Busey or Busey yells at Glover or Maria Conchita Alonso grabs Paxton by the package and threatens to rip off his balls.  A superior product to the film in almost every aspect.

I PAINTED THESE MYSELF!!

X-Men: First Class

xmen
xmen

It has been a while since we recorded a show. We desperately wanted to watch Mr. Popper's Penguins, but sadly it hadn't been released yet. We decided to fill the penguin shaped holes in our hearts with the newest X-Men movie. Now the 3rd X-Men film was not very good, and the Wolverine movie was considerably more unwatchable than the worst episode of American Idol. How would the new one stack up? I guess you will just have to listen to the show. We also talk about several other summer movies that I am sure will end up being worse than Mr. Popper's Penguins.

Predator 2

It’s been a long time since I saw Predator 2.  I daresay it has been since I saw it originally in the early 90s.  That doesn’t mean I haven’t caught bits and pieces of it on TV since then, but never have I sat down to watch it, from beginning to end, in the two decades since.  Why watch what I remember as was one of the most disappointing movies ever? Predator cost about $15 million to make, and grossed nearly $100 million at the box office, so 20th Century Fox green-lit a sequel.  It only made sense.  You remember the cast from the first one?  The special-ops commandos who get dropped out in the middle of BFE to kick ass and take names?  Bill Duke, Jesse Ventura, Carl Weathers and Arnold Schwarzenegger, you know, men’s men?  Who did they get to replace those behemoths?

Ruben Blades, Maria Conchita Alonso, Bill Paxton and Danny Glover.

No, really.  Chet Donnelly and Roger Murtaugh are ready to open a can of whoop-ass on the Predator!  Here is a picture, straight from the film, of the guy replacing Schwarzenegger.

The Predator is hunting THIS guy as America’s greatest warrior?  He’s dressed like Kojak!

Sitting down to watch the movie, I was hoping, at the very least, to get a belly full of laughs.  And, in a way, its starts in such a manner.

The scene opens on a gunfight between cops and drug dealers.  There is some reporter from tabloid news show “Hardcore” gesticulating in a wild manner.  Mike Harrigan (Glover) comes careening out of nowhere to interrupt his flagellations and wrecks in to a van.  He opens up the trunk of his car and has at least a dozen guns in the back…..he can’t decide which one to take with him!  Then he purposefully knocks off the door of his car so he can hang his head out the side while he’s driving since the windshield is too bullet-ridden to see through.  He sneaks behind a group of a half dozen Columbians and with a “hey assholes” blasts them all with his shotgun.  Why he sneaked behind them and then alerted them with a tongue-in-cheek salutation I do not know.

After this scene ties up, Glover gets back to the police department and it’s like something out of “Naked Gun.”  There’s probably over 100 people mobbing the front desk, and as we pan to the back there are cops wrestling prostitutes and a criminal head-butting an officer to the ground.  I honestly can’t tell if this stuff is supposed to be taken seriously.

For some reason the main plot of the film revolves around a 3-way war between the cops and two opposing drug dealing factions, the Jamaican contingent and the Colombian contingent.  The first hour of the film plays more like a sequel to “Marked for Death” than “Predator.”  Truth be told, Seagal may have been a better pick for the lead than Danny Glover.

The Predator hunts down and kills key members of each cartel, saving their skulls for his trophy case.  I guess they are supposed represent some sort of “challenge” for the Predator, but he dispatches large groups

of them each time in well under a minute of screen time.  I can’t really speak for the accuracy of the style of Jamaican crime lords in the early 90s, but these guys look like Parliament/Funkadelic.

Of course the Predator eventually kills a cop or two which makes it “personal” for Harrigan.  Yet Glover simply lumbers around the set as only Glover can, wild-eyed and foul-mouthed, with no idea he is to do battle with an alien.  He still doesn’t know what he’s up against until the last 30 minutes of the film when Special Agent Peter Keyes (played by Gary Busey….only the best for Predator 2) lets him in on the secret.  There’s some cockamamie explanation as to why they want to capture the Predator instead of killing him and then an intriguing set-up where they try and capture him.  Of course the entire scene is wasted due to poor direction.

Twenty years later this movie is actually worse then I remember.  The direction is boring beyond all belief.  Most of the action scenes are compromised of people shaking guns around randomly in the most non-realistic fashion possible while the Predator dispatches them.  The action takes place mostly off-screen while the victims scream profanities.  The setting (the slums of Los Angeles) is terrible, everything is dirty and colorless and bland.  The stalking of drug dealers makes little to no sense.  Who gives a damn how many drug dealers the Predator mangles and maims?  NOBODY.

Eventually Harrigan, while chasing the Predator during the “climax” of the film, falls down an elevator shaft where there is, quite inexplicably, a hole under the elevator leading to the Predator’s ship.  I don’t know if we are supposed to believe that is how the Predator comes and goes, but I sure in the hell hope not.  There’s a showdown between Harrigan and the Predator, of course, which takes place on the ship.  It is marginally exciting, made more so by the mind-numbingly low bar set by the rest of the film.

It probably speaks volumes about the film when the most intriguing element isn’t even relevant to the plot.  When Harrigan first walks in to the ship he sees a trophy case filled with skulls collected by the Predator.  And be damned if one of them isn’t an Alien’s skull!  This had me excited way back in the early 90s, too bad the idea of Aliens Vs. Predator took 14 years to incubate, and then turned out being nearly as big a turd as Predator 2.

Written by Ryan Venson

The Red Violin

Starring: Carlo Cecchi, Jean-Luc Bideau, Samuel L. Jackson Directed by: François Girard

A few weeks ago I reviewed I’m Not There, which moved from storyline to storyline with the greatest of ease.  This week I watched another movie that juggles several storylines – The Red Violin.

The story begins at an auction, where Samuel L. Jackson strides in, gives the doorman his coat and says, “Don’t let me forget this.”  Sure, Samuel L. is playing Charles Morritz, but the viewer doesn’t know that yet.  The jewel of the auction is the last violin crafted by Niccolo Bussotti (Carlo Cecchi), a uniquely beautiful piece in an unusual shade of red.

The back story on the violin is simple – Bussotti made the violin for his soon-to-be-born child.  It is a perfectly crafted instrument.  His wife Anna (Irene Grazoli) also anticipates the child, but with some misgivings, fearing she is too old to have a child.  She asks the family servant to tell her future as reassurance – though ultimately she is not strongly reassured.   When neither Anna nor the child survive the birth, the violin moves on to an orphanage in Vienna.

Each change of hands of the violin is bookended by the reveal of one tarot card from Anna’s reading as well as a re-visit to the auction, with another member of the audience linked to the violin’s past.  My main issue with the film is the transition devices used in the movie tend to disrupt the flow of the story rather than helping bridge the episodes – especially the auction scenes.

I can’t say that I really liked or disliked the movie; I found it very polarizing.  Some scenes were exceptionally good – the violin’s adventure with the gypsies, though short, was artistically shot and the music associated with that sequence is probably my favorite piece from the score.  The foreign language film aspect is also interesting – each of the violin’s “homes” is in a different county, thus Italian is spoken at its genesis, German and French in Vienna, English at Oxford and Chinese in Shanghai.

But overall I just didn’t like the auction aspect – the idea behind it was great, but the execution felt forced.  Other than the violin’s time with hedonistic virtuoso Frederick Pope (Jason Flemyng), the episodes depicted a rather sheltered and sometimes ‘lost’ life.  However, the other interwoven device – the reading of the tarot cards – is excellent.  The mystery of the violin’s strange color is also interesting, but perhaps a little forced as well.

If you like:

  • A tale tinged with melancholy
  • Journeys through history – including some historic periods and situations you don’t normally see (such as Maoist China through the eyes of a conflicted party member)
  • Beautiful violin music

Put it in the queue!

If you don’t like:

  • A film device for the sake of using a device when the actual tale would suffice
  • A tale tinged with melancholy
  • Samuel L. Jackson acting the badass in a situation where no badass is needed (does a specialist on identifying and restoring string instruments really need to be a badass?  Really?)

Don’t put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Surveillance

Starring:  Bill Pullman, Julia Ormond Director:  Jennifer Lynch

I can’t resist a tale told from multiple points of view. One of the best books I have ever read is a Star Wars-based book, Tales From the Mos Eisley Cantina.  It’s a collection of short stories that all center around Han Solo shooting Greedo at the cantina – but from the points of view of different characters who were in the cantina at that time.  Everyone brings in their own context, their own perspective.

So when I read a description for Surveillance summarizing the movie as three witnesses giving very different accounts of a crime, and two FBI agents have to figure out what really happened, I was interested.

The opening credits are interspersed with images of a murder – which the viewer might presume is the crime central to the plot.  Then, the two FBI agents Hallaway (Bill Pullman) and Anderson (Julia Ormond) roll into town to take over interrogation of the witnesses from the local police with the requisite tension in the air.

When the interrogations begin – all in separate rooms but also on a video feed to agent Hallaway – the viewer learns it’s not really the account of the murder they witnessed that varies from the truth (at least what they believe is true), it’s the events that got them to the scene.  While each witness explains their trajectory toward the murder, viewers see what actually happened…and that two of the three witnesses have crimes of their own to hide.

Nine-year-old Stephanie (Ryan Simpkins) mostly just won’t talk much.  She draws pictures of the events and drinks hot chocolate with marshmallows while Agent Anderson tries to get Stephanie’s account of how her vacationing family ended up murder victims.

Officer Bennett (Kent Harper) is just angry and bitter, especially as his partner Officer Conrad (French Stewart) died during the action.  He’s convinced they were good cops, but their activities leading up to the murder – including incidents with both Bobbi and Stephanie’s family – suggest otherwise.

Bobbi (Pell James) is, as described by one of the officers, ‘high as a kite.’  She and her boyfriend claim to have been in town for a job interview, but really they were visiting a dealer in the area.  But that’s also not the whole truth about their trip either.

At just over an hour and a half long (really only about an hour of thriller and 30 minutes of ‘untangling’), there are only a few spots that Surveillance drags.  The movie was co-written and directed by Jennifer Lynch (daughter of David Lynch), which initially worried me, but the cuts between present time and recollection are done well.  It’s not incomprehensible.

Interestingly, the murder scene is catalyzed by “Add It Up” by the Violent Femmes. And the resolution is pretty twisted, but still makes sense in its own way

If you:

  • Watch (or read) thrillers/mysteries or anything else in the crime or puzzle-solving genre because you like to try and figure it out before the end
  • Liked Natural Born Killers
  • Find it interesting how people can justify themselves and try (with or without success) to cover their asses for bad behavior

Put it in the queue!

If you:

  • Don’t like graphic death scenes
  • Are not ok with an open-ended resolution
  • Are highly offended by ‘bad cops’

Don’t put it in the queue.

I'm Not There

Starring: Cate Blanchett, Ben Whishaw, Christian Bale, Richard Gere, Marcus Carl Franklin, Heath Ledger Directed by: Todd Haynes

Though I'm not much of a Bob Dylan fan, I had been wanting to see I'm Not There for quite some time-if for no other reason than to see how six very different actors – Cate Blanchett, Heath Ledger, Christian Bale, Marcus Carl Franklin, Richard Gere and Ben Wishaw – portraying this musician.

But none of them are actually Bob Dylan – they are characters that embody different personas, phases, re-inventions, perceptions.  The movie doesn't follow a chronological timeline; rather, it has a more organic, theme-driven flow.  The story of a 10-year-old guitar-playing, ballad-singing, train-hopping wanderer who calls himself Woody Guthrie (Franklin) bleeds into the world of Billy (Gere), a loner living on the outskirts of an old west-style town.

The movie diverts into a documentary-style approach – a tale told by others –  when introducing Jack (Bale).  Jack is a musician whose songs about his observations, thoughts and feelings resonate with the general public.  Hounded by attention, expectations, praise and labels he doesn't want and cannot handle, Jack eventually abandons these 'finger pointing songs' and pursues a career as a minister.

Another figure feeling trapped by public opinion, Jude Quinn (Blanchett) gets a very cold reception from fans (and other musicians) when switching from folk fare to electric guitar-driven rock.  With the sunglasses, wardrobe, hairstyle, chain-smoking, and cryptic comments that are apparently quintessential Dylan, Blanchett deserves the attention she got for this role.  A pill-popping, never sleeping, somewhat twitchy ball of energy, cryptic answers and refusal to be defined by what other think he is, Quinn appears to be the real mouthpiece of the film.  The artist stifled on all sides – both by the public eye as well as a lifestyle/charade that seems to be more troublesome to keep up than it serves as an escape.

Robbie (Ledger) and Arthur (Wishaw) are more peripheral characters – interesting in the way they are woven into the film as the budding young celebrity indulgently reveling in the limelight and the poet delivering insights on all that unfolds.

Even though I've described the characters and some elements of the story, I've really given nothing away about the overall experience of watching I'm Not There. I was a little worried when reading that it was somewhat of an art film, as that usually indicated the movie will make no sense (i.e. Tuvalu.)  Also, some musician biopics can be very choppy (the first half or so of La Vie En Rose…yikes) or perhaps more fiction than fact.  For example, I thought Walk the Line was fantastic, but after my grandparents saw it, my Gran had to comment, "Well, it was good, but June Carter Cash wasn't near that pretty!"

I would also recommend that you take a look at some of the special features – I flipped through all the character descriptions and other notes on the film before watching it, and I think that helped make my expectations for the movie a little more reasonable.  It also made me appreciate how awesome the overall vision of the film was that six facets of one character work exceptionally well together to project a seamless impression of how dynamic Bob Dylan's life has been.

If you:

  • Appreciate philosophic ramblings – even if they are a little out there
  • Like to find little links throughout movies/books/etc that tie the characters together in a clever way
  • Have been searching for an example of a movie that is not really linear, but isn't so jumbled that it  that leaving you asking "…WTF??" at the end. (um….Lost Highway)
  • Like a good soundtrack

Put it in the queue!

However, if you:

  • Don't believe that a consistent theme can be a substitute for a plot – or believe a good movie must have a clear plotline to tell a story.
  • Don't like harmonica
  • Aren't big on philosophy and/or poetry
  • Prefer your artsy films completely incomprehensible

Don't put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Hobo with a Shotgun and Thor

Thor
Thor

It is kind of hard to miss the media blitz for the latest Marvel film Thor, but just as entertaining, and maybe even more so, is the grindhouse inspired movie Hobo with a Shotgun. Both movies promise action packed sequences against the forces of evil, but only one of them has a hobo...with a shotgun. If hearing about these two films isn't enough for you, there is also a quick review of the new Fast 5, and an original theme song for...you guessed it...Hobo with a Shotgun. http://youtu.be/ssHEAOrAdCU

Hobo
Hobo

Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist

Starring: Michael Cera, Kat Dennings Directed by: Peter Sollett

When I was a senior in high school – and the summer after graduating – I spent a lot of weekends going to see local bands play.  I'd spend the last hour of checking groceries at the North Park Schnucks watching the clock, quickly count down my cash drawer at 9:30, then run upstairs to change clothes and layer on a ton of eye makeup and lipstick.  A quick 15 minute drive got me to the venue (usually a loft above an appliance store on Franklin Street), and then I just hung out and listened to the bands until 11:30-ish, as I generally had a midnight curfew.

Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist seemed like it would be a cute movie – the 'accidental romance' schtick, some good music, a concert and comic relief via the drunk best friend who gets lost in the big bad city.

First, I must say that Michael Cera's agent deserves a swift kick in the shins – this kid seems to be getting typecast as a guy with shaggy hair and skinny jeans who is either 1.) in high school moping over girls or 2.) barely out of high school moping about girls.  It might have been more enjoyable if I'd seen the movie closer to the 2008 release date and not within a few months of watching Scott Pilgrim vs. The World as I really felt like he was playing the exact same character.

Next, I think it is probably about time for me to stop trying to watch teen movies.  They were still ok about 10 years ago, but now I think I am too old.  At one point in the movie somebody is talking about it being 4am, and everyone is still driving around.  My immediate thought was "WTF, don't these kids have a curfew?!?!?"

Also, the music was not that good.  When the movie title has 'infinite playlist' in the title, I expect lots and lots of music.  Most of the music was in the background, and I only recognized two of the songs.  Again, maybe I'm getting old – but I wouldn't have to look very hard to find a better playlist.  In fact, I can think of several soundtracks – Singles, Dazed and Confused, Reality Bites, Mortal Kombat – that I would prefer to listen to versus this stuff.

I just expected more charming little 'I think I really like you' moments between Nick and Norah.  There were a few, but really it seemed like they spent more time arguing or running into their exes at various clubs than developing feelings for each other.

Despite all this, I did find a few elements to enjoy.  Kat Dennings good as Norah, and I went through the entire movie marveling over the awesome shade of lipstick she was wearing.  She seemed more like a high school student than Nick's manipulative ex-girlfriend Tris (Alexis Dziena) and had the right balance of vulnerable and fearless.  She seemed very down-to-earth despite a privileged background. Gum chewing party girl Caroline (Ari Graynor) was also pretty humorous if you didn't think about her character too seriously, as were Nick's bandmates Thom (Aaron Yoo) and Dev (Rafi Gavron).

The best part of the movie was in the special features.   The four-minute 'puppet show' version of the movie Kat Dennings created and narrates is hilarious.  I actually recommend that you watch this (or at least the first two minutes) instead – no queue needed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I97HHzlm4Q

Written by Jennifer Venson

The Atomic Cafe

Directed by: Jayne Loader, Kevin Rafferty, Pierce Rafferty Initially, The Atomic Café looks and sounds like an old film (not a video – an actual reel-to-reel film) your fifth-grade science teacher would trot out on a day s/he didn’t feel like actively teaching. Grainy, spotty images, quavery sound…narration that sounded like it had been read by a stuffy radio announcer trained in the pre-TV era.

And in truth, this 1982 documentary about the atomic bomb and its role in US war, propaganda peacekeeping in the 1940s and 50s should look old because pretty much all the footage comes from the archives. Interviews, military training films, other 'public information' films, if you will, patch together a fascinating story about how the atomic bomb and its consequences were 'sold' to the American public.

Early clips cover the first atomic bomb drop. According to interviews, the Enola Gay crew thought they were on a 'routine' mission and did not know exactly what they were carrying to unleash on the Hiroshima target until they were well on course. Then after dropping the bomb, some marveled at the sight. One soldier was filmed describing the thrill of the drop and explosion – 'pretty as a picture.'

It's very easy to watch this and clips of Americans dancing in the streets after the victory in Japan as with a damning eye. How dare these people act so flippantly about a bomb with such ridiculously destructive power? It's easy for us – citizens of a country juggling three foreign wars with minimal personal consequences – to condemn them. However, it's also easy to understand how excited people were for life to return to normal. Also, the next hour's worth of the documentary suggests most Americans probably had little to no idea exactly how destructive the atomic bomb was.

In fact, interviews captured in the documentary indicated Hiroshima was targeted primarily because it hadn't been bombed and scientists needed a better understanding of its effects in a 'real' environment. An additional test done at Bikini Atoll to study the impact of an atomic bomb explosion on animals and ships yielded some unexpected insights – at the expense of innocent bystanders. Shifting winds and a larger-than-expected blast radius treated a Japanese fishing boat crew to radiation poisoning and exposed native islanders already evacuated from the drop zone to radiation. News agencies reported no ill effects to the islanders, but footage shown in this documentary suggested otherwise.

Subsequent footage of the army sending eager young troops directly into an atomic blast zone – and telling them radiation is the least dangerous of the three main dangers of an atomic bomb (vs. the blast or heat) – convinced me this documentary was rightfully classified as a horror movie. Even worse was watching all the young troops scurry out of their foxholes and trot toward an awful tower of smoke, not knowing that the damage has probably already been done if they forgot to close their eyes or mouth during the blast and got a faceful of irradiated dirt. Army training films with horrendously wooden acting show characters waxing poetically about how an atomic blast is 'a wonderful sight to behold' made me feel ill.

In addition, heavy leveraging of the Cold War, Red Scare and the dangers of Communism were, presumably, also fed to the public. Propaganda films showed the Statue of Liberty exploding, a giant fist crushing symbols of democracy. Another program challenged potential naysayers of the 'domino effect,' illustrating through a daylong experiment in a small Wisconsin town, how easy it would be for communists to take over even in America. Notably, the Communist experiment was sponsored by two California malls featuring lots of free parking for those cars – things Americans have a lot of that Communists don't.

Finally, the power of fear and ignorance continues to provide interesting fare. Video of 'duck and cover' drills in case of nuclear attack are somewhat laughable – as are a demonstration of a children's lead-lined protective suit complete with head protection for the post-nuclear world. Also in an era where most houses don't have basements to protect really well from a tornado, much less a nuclear attack, it was interesting to see advertising and advice for the largely ineffective fallout shelters, such as: "Be sure to include tranquilizers to ease the strain and monotony of life in a fallout shelter. A bottle of 100 should be sufficient for a family of four. Tranquilizers are not a narcotic, and are not habit-forming."

Overall, this documentary reminds me of a Patton Oswalt routine where he's talking about how sometimes science is all about "could of" instead of "should have." One quote from the film mirror this, saying, 'science has outpaced what we can emotionally and intellectually handle.' I think this is a good thing to consider when watching the film – and to continually keep in mind as modern war keeps evolving.

If you:

· Like History Channel-style fare

· Like science

· Have a somewhat pessimistic/critical view of human nature, war and culture

Put it in the queue!

If you:

· Are overly sensitive about political correctness (i.e. will flip out over the use of 'Japs' and depiction of native islanders as simpleminded)

· Are still afraid that Communists will take over the world

· Don't understand that sometimes documentaries can be propaganda themselves

Don't put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Jackass 3

Starring: Johnny Knoxville Directed by: Jeff Tremaine

When I was in high school, the cutting edge in class projects was making a video.  Inevitably one in four students had parents with a clunky mid-1990s camera.  Every once in a while we had some humorous outtakes – a dog barks at the exact time two characters are shaking hands, somebody trips over a fallen branch while being chased through the forest by wiener dogs, Mac Duff turns into an alien and slays Macbeth and friends, somebody starts cracking up about the rubber rat and (also fake) disembodied foot just…sitting there in the frame while someone else it trying to do a serious newscast about the problems of trench foot and trench rats during WWI.

Basically, everything we thought was funny while filming wasn't remotely funny to anyone else.

Herein lies the beauty of Jackass.  It began on MTV as a series based on people who made videos of themselves doing stupid stunts that people found hilarious. Why in the world it is funny to see grown men snort wasabi up their nose (then promptly vomit), shoot bottle rockets out of their asses, give themselves paper cuts and devise myriad ways get hit in the nuts or fall off a skateboard/roller skates/bike/pretty much anything with wheels – I don't understand it.  But it makes me laugh. A lot.

I was initially hesitant about seeing Jackass 3 and waited until it was on video.  The TV show and first movie:  comedy gold.  Jackass Number Two was, literally, a turd.  It had too many snakes and too much gratuitous poop for me to really enjoy it.

Jackass 3 falls solidly between the two.  It doesn't quite recapture the ridiculous magic of Night Pandas, Hardware Store Crap or Golf Course Airhorns, but it does revisit quite a few classic gags (no pun intended…though there are more than a few gags from the cast, crew and potentially viewers).

The highlights:

  • Wee Bar Brawl – starring Jason "Wee Man" Acuña and others.  The reactions of the other bar patrons are absolutely classic.
  • Jet Stream.  Ever wanted to see how powerful of a wind storm a jet engine can kick up?  How far will it chuck a bag of flour, a tomato, a shoe? Will it be funny to see people get knocked over while trying to walk into the wind?  Of course.  This skit also prompts Johnny Knoxville to say, "That's the story of Jackass there! Pissing in the wind!"
  • Roller Buffalo – funnier more to see Johnny Knoxville dancing around on roller skates in a muddy buffalo pen while wearing a pink 1950s-style cardign emblazoned with the Jackass logo than the buffalo charge.
  • Bungee Boogie – More stupid ramp tricks, though the surfboard-on-a-skateboard stunt is pretty awesome.
  • Scooter Shopping – not quite as funny as some of the 'old man shenanigans' from prior skits, but pretty hilarious.  Crowd reactions are always the best part.

The lowlights:

  • Super Mighty Glue – involves ripping off chest/back/chin hair via a handful of super glue.  Kinda painful to watch.
  • Sweat Suit Cocktail – involved Steve-O drinking bodily fluids then vomiting profusely.  This one almost made me toss my cookies.
  • Lamborghini Tooth Pull – need I say more
  • Snake Pit - I hate snakes.  Probably not as much as Bam Margera or Indiana Jones, but I still have some trouble seeing a bunch of the legless reptiles wriggling around, ready for action.

If you:

  • Enjoy the ridiculous stunts the Jackass crew invents – or at least the crowd reactions when they do the stunts in public
  • Would enjoy America's Funniest Home Videos – with a naughty twist
  • Have ever secretly had a crush on Johnny Knoxville or any of his stupid buddies

Put it in the queue!

If you:

  • Strongly dislike seeing people eliminate bodily fluids (vomit, poo, urine, blood) on camera
  • Don't think people getting hit in the nuts is funny
  • Have never found Jackass even remotely humorous before

Don't put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

From Russia With Love

Satrring: Sean Connery, Daniela Bianchi Directed by: Terence Young

There's only one Bond – James Bond.  And the consummate James Bond is Sean Connery.

I've read more novels by Ian Fleming featuring the dashing 007 than I've seen films about this spy extraordinaire.  The books are wonderfully well-written and better than I ever expected.  I just never got into the movies all that much.

Recently my friend Enrique Guemez suggested I watch From Russia With Love as it he thought it followed the novel very closely and wanted to see what my thoughts were on the film.

After watching it, I agreed.  The movie opens on a chess tournament – no 007 in sight.  Instead, we meet the Russians.  Controlled and frosty as the Cold War itself, they conspire to trap James Bond by tapping into his weakness for women.  The movie nicely condenses several chapters into a quick conference with the key Russian players – Colonel Klebb (Lotta Lenya), the assassin 'Red' Grant (Robert Shaw) she hand-picks (and punches to test his mettle) as the man to kill James Bond,  then introduces us to the handsome Bond whiling away the morning with one of his many admirers.

More importantly, M (Bernard Lee) has just been told a woman working in the Russian intelligence office in Istanbul has fallen in love with Bond based on his file and desperately wants him to help her escape to England. The British secret service immediately suspects something is rotten in Denmark, but can't figure out the rub.

With a briefcase full of tricks (primarily hidden weapons), Bond travels to Turkey to rendezvous with this mysterious woman Tatiana Romanova (Daniela Bianchi).  While he waits for her to make herself known, he pals around with the jovial Kerim Bey (Pedro Armendáriz).  Bey, the longtime intelligence contact in Turkey, has many children to help him run his cover business as well as secretive activities, excellent Turkish cigarettes, a Rolls Royce, a Russian operative trying to kill him, and a periscope that was strategically installed to help him spy on the Russian intelligence office.

I honestly did not expect much of the adventures of Bond and Bey to make it into the movie – particularly the gypsy fight (which is a bit different from the book, but not much). However, they prove to be very action-packed and entertaining.

Bond's first meeting with Romanova has all the requisite sensuality and drama, as does their escape from Istanbul (and the Russians) on the Orient Express…then a 'borrowed' produce truck…then a speedboat.  Full of daring evasions, explosions, charm and the luck of the Bond, our hero, his cohorts and his lady deliver an exciting adventure until the very end, when a last-minute attempt to salvage this konspirastia almost succeeds.

As probably only the third Jame Bond movie I have seen in its entirely, From Russia With Love delivers. I also realized while watching this movie that James Bond is probably the reason action heroes feel they have to be ready with a one-liner.  He has several good one throughout the film, particularly after dispatching a pesky foe.

If you:

  • Like a good action flick
  • Love James Bond or have ever wanted to be a 'Bond girl'
  • Like reading a good book and then seeing an equally good movie version

Put it in the queue!

However, if you:

  • Want the Russians to win
  • Prefer Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Daniel Craig, George Lazenby, or Pierce Brosnan as James Bond

Don't put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson

Sucker Punch

Starring: Emily Browning, Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone Directed by: Zack Snyder

“YOU WILL BE UNPREPARED”

This is the tagline for Sucker Punch, and rarely has a tagline spoken the gospel truth like this one has. To be honest I really didn’t know what to prepare myself for when I decided to watch Sucker Punch. Sure the reviews weren’t very good for it, but sometimes I just make up my mind that I want to watch a movie, critics be damned. What I wasn’t prepared for while watching Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch was that everything was a contradiction. Yes, I was certainly unprepared.

The film starts off well enough. We are quickly introduced to “Baby Doll” as we see her mother dying. Soon after, the evil step-father comes into the picture, apparently quite upset that only Baby Doll and her little sister were listed in the will. Evil step-father takes out his aggression with some unwanted sexual advances towards Baby Doll and then little sister. Baby Doll fights back, accidentally kills her little sister instead, and is sent to an insane asylum full of attractive girls where evil step-father has paid off an orderly to make sure to make sure that Baby Doll gets a lobotomy. All this happens during the opening credits. The rest of the film exists primarily in a fantasy word that Baby Doll has conjured up as a way to deal with her current hardships.

So let’s talk about those contradictions now. First, if you have seen any of the posters for this film, you know that it was designed with young men in mind. The film has been filled to the brim with nubile young girls who manage to wear next to nothing for the entire length of the film. Yet somehow Snyder has made Sucker Punch a very unsexy movie. Maybe this is because each one of the girls is a generic representation of a 12 year old’s wet dream. Perhaps the eye can’t focus on their beauty because it is too distracted by the blemish that is the entirely computer generated world that Snyder vomited onto the screen. Tough to say.

Next up we need to talk about the length of the film.  Most sites I looked at listed this movie at being between 110-120 minutes.  This is also incorrect…kind of. The movie is only about 45 minutes long, but managed to reach the two hour mark by adding obscene amounts of slow motion shots. Big gun battles in slow motion, that’s cool. Sword fights in slow motion, that’s not too bad. Walking around in slow motion…err…okay. Water moving towards a drain on the floor in slow motion?! You have got to be fucking kidding! I think the credits rolling were the fastest thing to happen in this movie.

Finally, I want to talk about the main component of this film, the reason that I decided to spit in the face of countless critics and give Sucker Punch a chance, the action. I like mindless action movies, and this movie seemed to fit that bill quite nicely. Sucker Punch has German zombie robots hell bent on destruction, dragons fighting a WWII bomber plane, a sword fight between a girl and three giant samurai statues, alien robots riding a runaway train with a bomb on it, and a prison break. In spite of all that Sucker Punch was soooo boring. The action becomes tedious and lazily tries to move the story along.  The constant sound of everything exploding became a white noise that was almost lulling me to sleep.

I don’t know how things went as wrong as they did while Sucker Punch was being made. I still believe that Zack Snyder can make a good movie, but you wouldn’t know by watching this one. It makes me nervous about giving him the reigns to the next Superman movie, but I will remain hopefully optimistic. Maybe I should be grateful that I had a pass to see this movie, but that brings me to my final contradiction; while I did manage to see this movie for free…my god did I pay.

Written by Drew Martin

Black Death and Source Code

This week reviews of director Christopher Smith's new film "Black Death," which isn't nearly as cheery as the name implies, as well as director Duncan Jones new outing, "Source Code."  I believe Jones is related to some moderately famous 70s musician.  Can't remember who for sure, but if I had to put my money on it I would guess Captain Beefheart.

beefy
beefy

Your Highness

Starring: Danny McBride, Natalie Portman, James Franco Directed by: David Gordon Green

It is rare for me to go to the movie theater.  It is even less likely that I go to see a mainstream movie rather than an indie or foreign film at the Mariemont or Esquire theaters.  It is exceptionally rare that the movie is so bad I feel that I have wasted several hours of my life. Before Saturday, the last film I felt this way about was The Chronicles of Riddick (2004).  Now I feel that way about Your Highness.

When I first saw trailers for Your Highness, it sort of reminded me of Robin Hood:  Men in Tights.   Medieval silliness, bawdy humor, bows and arrows.  I haven't been a fan of too many recent comedies as most of them substitute thoroughly ridiculous plot elements and dick & fart jokes for a decent script.  However, I had been pleasantly surprised by one other film directed by David Gordon Green – The Pineapple Express.  I thought at parts of that movie were pretty clever (especially the process serving via costumes shtick in the beginning), and it made me laugh.

I think I laughed ONCE during Your Highness.  The whole premise is that Prince Thadeous (Danny McBride) is a royal screwup.  He can't complete even a simple diplomatic or heroic quest and pretty much spends his time loafing about the palace or smoking bowls.  His brother, Prince Fabious (James Franco) is the golden boy – returning from many a successful quest slaying monsters, rescuing fair maidens…the usual fare.

In fact, Fabious returns from his most recent quest with the beautiful Belladonna (Zooey Deschanel), who had been imprisoned in a tower by the evil magician Leezar (Justin Theroux).  Fabious intends to marry her and insists Thadeous stand by him as his best man.  This incenses his questing buddies, who feel they deserve to stand up with Fabious more than his sluggard brother.  Regardless, the wedding never happens as Leezar magically snatches back Belladonna as she is needed for a prophecy he intends to fulfill.

Fabious immediately goes into questing mode to rescue her; their king and father insists Thadeous go as well as his last chance at doing something honorable for the family.   Grudgingly, he and his page Courtney (Rasmus Hardiker) load themselves into a carriage for the journey.  Thought Thadeous intends to spend the whole quest in a drug-addled haze, things do not go as he expects.

First, they must get a prophecy from a purple, perverted, pot-smoking puppet wizard who gives them a magical compass and tells them they have to get a sword make of a unicorn's horn to kill Leezar.  Then things go downhill.  After losing the other knights, their carriages and horses, the brothers are captured by an army of scantily-clad women and thrown into a gladiatorial arena for the entertainment of the diaper-clad Marteetee (John Fricker).

After the mysterious Isabel (Natalie Portman) – also on a quest – saves their hides, they resume traveling with only a few days before the prophecy-fulfilling event.  (Leezar calls the prophecy night "The Fuckening" as he must impregnate Belladonna during the eclipse of the two moons so she can bear him a ferocious dragon.)  Fabious runs into some trouble, and it is up to Thadeous to find the sword and save the day.

By the end of the movie I was pretty much begging for a fart joke.  The pot and dick jokes got old about an hour and a half before Thadeous began wearing a minotaur's severed phallus around his neck on a string as a trophy.  The best part of the movie was the bag of Raisinettes I bought at the concession stand and the trailer for the X-Men prequel.

I do not recommend that anyone waste any money or time on this sorry excuse for a film, either at the theater or in the queue.  They just don't make 'em like they used to.

(If you are also yearning for a good quest-related fart joke, here you go.  When I was a kid, I used to play the King's Quest games with my best friend on ye olde 1980s PC.  In KQ III, you controlled the game actions by typing in commands.  Being about 10 years old at the time, we thought it was freaking hilarious to type in "fart" as a command.  The game's response was, "You are a naughty little wizard."  I miss games like that…)

Written by Jennifer Venson

How to Train Your Dragon

Starring: Jay Baruchel Directed by: Dean DeBlois, Chris Sanders

Put your stereotype hat on and describe a Viking.  You're probably thinking big, hairy, strong, wears a helmet with horns, lived in cold northern countries in Europe (or in Minnesota) and probably swings a big axe.

In the movie How to Train Your Dragon, Hiccup (voiced by Jay Baruchel) is a young, skinny Viking who does not seem fierce in the least.  When his village is attacked by livestock-stealing, fire-breathing dragons (which happens on a regular basis), Hiccup has to help sharpen weapons rather than join the fight.  He tries to compensate for his lack of stature with weapon-tossing contraptions, but he has a reputation for bumbling into more chaos rather than taking down a dragon.

And he wants more than anything to prove himself with a dragon kill, just like everyone else.  It's what Vikings in his village do – especially his father, Stoick the Vast.

Though Hiccup is fairly certain his bola-throwing machine downed one of the mysterious Night Fury dragons ("You can't see them…but they never miss!") during a battle, no one else saw the hit…or find the fallen dragon.  All they saw was Hiccup getting in the way during the fight.

Hiccup knows his father considers his total lack of fierceness – physically and mentally – a disappointment.  So he is shocked to learn his father is sending him to training classes with the other teenagers (including the beautiful yet fierce Astrid, voiced by America Ferrera) to learn how to kill dragons.

Of course, the other kids want nothing to do with him.  Which reminds me of the intro to the "I'm Not Okay (I Promise)" video by My Chemical Romance:

"You like D&D, Audrey Hepburn, Fangoria, Harry Houdini and croquet.  You can't swim, you can't dance and you don't know karate.  Face it, you're never going to make it!"

However, Hiccup is still convinced there's a dead or injured Night Fury in the woods somewhere – which would give him tremendous credibility in the tribe.  He finds it…but cannot bring himself to kill it.  He helps the Night Fury escapes, but it ends up trapped in a secluded valley.  Fascinated by the beast, Hiccup begins to learn about the creature's habits and devises a way to help "Toothless" fly again.

Hiccup also realizes from his training that Vikings do not know as much about dragons as they think they do – the one 'fact' applying to all of them is – EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, KILL ON SIGHT.

Can Hiccup change the way this extremely stubborn Viking tribe thinks?  Can he get through dragon killing training without actually killing a dragon?  Will his father ever be proud of him?  Will he win Astrid's heart?  (Duh, of course!  This is a kids' movie.)

Not only does the movie have all the excellent visual trappings expect of an animated feature, I thought the overall situations and themes were excellent.  Honestly,  I liked this movie better than Toy Story 3 and would find a way to teach with this movie if I were still in the classroom.

This movie was highly recommended to me by my good friend Peggy Parker, and I highly recommend it to you.

If you:

  • Have ever felt different/alone/rejected/like you just didn't fit in
  • Have ever proved the people who doubted you wrong
  • Have ever had a pet and know how rewarding it can be

Put it in the queue!

However, if you

  • Have ever felt superior to 'weaklings' and are convinced brawn is better than brains
  • Are ok with believing the conventional 'wisdom' and have never stopped to question if what we 'know' is based on experience or speculation

Don't put it in the queue.

Written by Jennifer Venson